Atom Z560 vs Celeron 877

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 877 and Atom Z560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Atom
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date	1 July 2012 (12 years ago)	1 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 877 and Atom Z560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	1.4 GHz	2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.4 GHz	0.13 GHz
Bus type	DMI 2.0	FSB
Bus rate	4 × 5 GT/s	533.33 MT/s
Multiplier	14	16
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	131 mm2	26 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	504 million	47 million
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	no data	0.75V-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 877 and Atom Z560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCBGA1023	PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 877 and Atom Z560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
FMA	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	+
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data
FSB parity	no data	-

Security technologies

Celeron 877 and Atom Z560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 877 and Atom Z560 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 877 and Atom Z560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	unknown
Maximum memory size	16 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	21.335 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors	-
Clear Video	-	-
Clear Video HD	-	-
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	-
InTru 3D	-	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 877 and Atom Z560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	2	-
eDP	+	-
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	-
CRT	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 877 and Atom Z560.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 July 2012	1 June 2010
Physical cores	2	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	2 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 877 and Atom Z560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---