Pentium Dual T4500 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Aggregate performance score
Pentium Dual Core T4500 outperforms VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2916 | 2568 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | VIA | Intel Pentium Dual Core |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | 2.27 |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 17 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 132 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium Dual Core T4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium Dual Core T4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.47 | 0.84 |
| Recency | 17 May 2011 | 1 January 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 35 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 29.6% lower power consumption.
Pentium Dual T4500, on the other hand, has a 78.7% higher aggregate performance score.
The Pentium Dual Core T4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium Dual Core T4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
