Atom Z3735G vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | VIA | no data |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 17 May 2011 (13 years ago) | 9 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $17 |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 132 mm2 | 112 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | UTFCBGA592 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27.5 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 5.3 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 646 MHz |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 May 2011 | 9 April 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 2 Watt |
Atom Z3735G has an age advantage of 2 years, a 81.8% more advanced lithography process, and 1250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Atom Z3735G. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
