FX-8170 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and FX-8170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2916not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesVIAno data
Power efficiency1.62no data
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and FX-8170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB384 KB
L2 cache4 MB8 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography40 nm32 nm
Die size132 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and FX-8170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)27.5 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and FX-8170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and FX-8170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and FX-8170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and FX-8170.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2011 23 October 2012
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 125 Watt

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 363% lower power consumption.

FX-8170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and FX-8170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook processor while FX-8170 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and FX-8170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
AMD FX-8170
FX-8170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate FX-8170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 or FX-8170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.