Core 2 Duo E4300 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Aggregate performance score
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4300 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Core 2 Duo E4300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2916 | 3022 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | VIA | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | 0.54 |
| Architecture codename | CNQ (2011) | Allendale (2006−2009) |
| Release date | 17 May 2011 (13 years ago) | July 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Core 2 Duo E4300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 132 mm2 | 111 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 167 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.5V |
Compatibility
Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Core 2 Duo E4300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27.5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Core 2 Duo E4300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Core 2 Duo E4300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Core 2 Duo E4300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Core 2 Duo E4300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.47 | 0.37 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 65 Watt |
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 140.7% lower power consumption.
The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E4300 in performance tests.
Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Duo E4300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Core 2 Duo E4300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
