EPYC 7773X vs Turion X2 RM-75

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 RM-75
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.60
+13614%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Turion X2 RM-75 by a whopping 13614% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 RM-75 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking296922
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x AMD Turionno data
Power efficiency1.1419.47
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Milan-X (2022)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-75 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate4000 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-75 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketS1SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 RM-75 0.42
EPYC 7773X 57.60
+13614%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion X2 RM-75 670
EPYC 7773X 91491
+13555%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 57.60
Recency 1 January 2009 22 March 2022
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

Turion X2 RM-75 has 700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 13614.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-75 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion X2 RM-75 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-75 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Turion X2 RM-75
Turion X2 RM-75
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 RM-75 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.