Celeron N3060 vs Turion X2 RM-75

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon X2 QL-60 Athlon X2 QL-62 Athlon X2 QL-64 Athlon X2 QL-65 Turion X2 RM-74
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron N3050 Celeron N3060 Pentium N3700 Pentium N3710

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 RM-75
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Celeron N3060
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.42

Contents

Turion X2 RM-75
Celeron N3060 Celeron N3060

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29832990
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD TurionIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.136.59
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)15 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.48 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
Bus rate4000 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 RM-75 0.42
Celeron N3060 0.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion X2 RM-75 670
+0.9%
Celeron N3060 664

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 RM-75 1717
+35.5%
Celeron N3060 1267

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 RM-75 3390
+41.4%
Celeron N3060 2397

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion X2 RM-75 38
+13.5%
Celeron N3060 43.13

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Recency 1 January 2009 15 January 2016
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N3060 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron N3060, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Turion X2 RM-75
Turion X2 RM-75
Intel Celeron N3060
Celeron N3060
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion X2 RM-75 Turion X2 RM-75
vs
Athlon II N330 Athlon II N330
Celeron N3060 Celeron N3060
vs
A4-3320M A4 3320M
Turion X2 RM-75 Turion X2 RM-75
vs
Core 2 Duo T5900 Core 2 Duo T5900
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 Celeron Dual Core T3000
vs
Celeron N4020 Celeron N4020
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 Celeron Dual Core T3000
vs
Celeron T3000 Celeron T3000
i5-540UM Core i5 540UM
vs
A6-9220e A6 9220e
Turion X2 RM-75 Turion X2 RM-75
vs
Celeron B815 Celeron B815
Turion X2 RM-75 Turion X2 RM-75
vs
Pentium 987 Pentium 987
Turion X2 RM-75 Turion X2 RM-75
vs
Celeron N2910 Celeron N2910
Turion X2 RM-75 Turion X2 RM-75
vs
Celeron 877 Celeron 877
Turion X2 RM-75 Turion X2 RM-75
vs
Core 2 Duo T5600 Core 2 Duo T5600
Athlon X2 QL-66 Athlon X2 QL-66
vs
Celeron B800 Celeron B800
Athlon X2 QL-66 Athlon X2 QL-66
vs
Celeron 877 Celeron 877

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 798 votes

Rate Celeron N3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 RM-75 or Celeron N3060, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.