Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Turion Neo X2 L625

Place in the ranking	3126	441
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	2x AMD Turion Neo	AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency	1.42	52.63
Architecture codename	Congo (2009)	Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date	1 October 2009 (15 years ago)	3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	16
Base clock speed	no data	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	5.1 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	512 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	8 MB
L3 cache	no data	16 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	4 nm
Die size	no data	178 mm²
Maximum core temperature	95 °C	100 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	ASB1 BGA	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	HyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection	no data
VirusProtect	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion Neo X2 L625 0.27

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 15.57
+5667%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion Neo X2 L625 432

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U 24740
+5627%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.27	15.57
Recency	1 October 2009	3 May 2023
Physical cores	2	8
Threads	2	16
Chip lithography	65 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	28 Watt

Turion Neo X2 L625 has 55.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, on the other hand, has a 5666.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion Neo X2 L625 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.