Xeon Silver 4210 vs i3-330UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-330UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.35
Xeon Silver 4210
2019
10 cores / 20 threads, 85 Watt
8.55
+2343%

Xeon Silver 4210 outperforms Core i3-330UM by a whopping 2343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3064893
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.29
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency1.849.52
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$501

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier922
L1 cache128 KB640 KB
L2 cache512 KB10 MB
L3 cache3 MB13.75 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C78 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketBGA1288FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size8 GB1 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-330UM 0.35
Xeon Silver 4210 8.55
+2343%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-330UM 555
Xeon Silver 4210 13575
+2346%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-330UM 189
Xeon Silver 4210 961
+408%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-330UM 422
Xeon Silver 4210 5592
+1225%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 8.55
Recency 24 May 2010 2 April 2019
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 85 Watt

i3-330UM has 372.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4210, on the other hand, has a 2342.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Silver 4210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-330UM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-330UM is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4210 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-330UM and Xeon Silver 4210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-330UM
Core i3-330UM
Intel Xeon Silver 4210
Xeon Silver 4210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 7 votes

Rate Core i3-330UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 47 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-330UM or Xeon Silver 4210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.