Ultra 7 265KF vs Turion II Ultra M600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Ultra M600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.51
+6367%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Turion II Ultra M600 by a whopping 6367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Ultra M600 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking281782
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data99.40
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Turion II Ultrano data
Power efficiency1.5628.25
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion II Ultra M600 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Ultra M600 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin1851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Turion II Ultra M600 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Ultra M600 0.58
Ultra 7 265KF 37.51
+6367%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II Ultra M600 923
Ultra 7 265KF 59590
+6356%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 37.51
Recency 10 September 2009 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Turion II Ultra M600 has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 6367.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion II Ultra M600 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M600 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Ultra M600
Turion II Ultra M600
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Ultra M600 or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.