Atom x5-E3930 vs Turion II Ultra M600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion II Ultra M600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58
Atom x5-E3930
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.58

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28212818
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Turion II Ultra5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency1.577.84
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)30 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket S1 (s1g3) 638-pinIntel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1866
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II Ultra M600 0.58
Atom x5-E3930 0.58

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion II Ultra M600 923
Atom x5-E3930 928
+0.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2009 30 August 2014
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

Atom x5-E3930 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Ultra M600 and Atom x5-E3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Ultra M600
Turion II Ultra M600
Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 14 votes

Rate Turion II Ultra M600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Ultra M600 or Atom x5-E3930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.