Celeron 1005M vs Turion II M500
Aggregate performance score
Celeron 1005M outperforms Turion II M500 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2847 | 2704 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Turion II | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 1.43 | 1.89 |
Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
Release date | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 July 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
Detailed specifications
Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | 5 GT/s |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | no data | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | no data | 94 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | FCPGA988 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
PowerNow | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
My WiFi | no data | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
SDVO | no data | + |
CRT | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.53 | 0.70 |
Recency | 10 September 2009 | 1 July 2013 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
Celeron 1005M has a 32.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron 1005M is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II M500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II M500 and Celeron 1005M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.