Mobile Sempron M100 vs Celeron 1005M
Aggregate performance score
Celeron 1005M outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a whopping 218% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2720 | 3202 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Mobile Sempron |
Power efficiency | 1.89 | 0.83 |
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Caspian (2009) |
Release date | 1 July 2013 (11 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 3200 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | 94 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCPGA988 | S |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
SDVO | + | no data |
CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.70 | 0.22 |
Recency | 1 July 2013 | 10 September 2009 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron 1005M has a 218.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 81.8% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.
The Celeron 1005M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Mobile Sempron M100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.