Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-52

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-52
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.34
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.51
+4462%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-52 by a whopping 4462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3079449
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency1.0452.39
Architecture codenameTrinidad (2006−2007)Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date17 May 2006 (18 years ago)3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache1 MB8 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt28 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 15.51
Recency 17 May 2006 3 May 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U has a 4461.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 10.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-52 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-52 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52
Turion 64 X2 TL-52
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-52 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 50 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-52 or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.