Celeron M 370 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Aggregate performance score
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Celeron M 370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3067 | 3300 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 1.01 | 0.68 |
| Architecture codename | Taylor (2006) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 17 May 2006 (18 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $154 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Celeron M 370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 147 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 154 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Celeron M 370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | H-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Celeron M 370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE(1,2,3), AMD64 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Celeron M 370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Celeron M 370 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.33 | 0.15 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 21 Watt |
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 has a 120% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron M 370, on the other hand, has 47.6% lower power consumption.
The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-50 and Celeron M 370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
