Apple M2 Max vs Turion 64 ML-32
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 ML-32 and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 385 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Turion 64 | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | no data | 20.10 |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | no data |
| Release date | March 2005 (19 years ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 ML-32 and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.79 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 3.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | 67000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 ML-32 and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 79 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-32 and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 79 Watt |
Turion 64 ML-32 has 125.7% lower power consumption.
Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Turion 64 ML-32 and Apple M2 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-32 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
