Xeon Gold 6538N vs Turion 64 ML-28

VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.61
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesTurion 64no data
Power efficiencyno data13.05
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,351

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size125 mm22x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket754FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion 64 ML-28 254
Xeon Gold 6538N 44895
+17575%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 32
Threads 1 64
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 205 Watt

Turion 64 ML-28 has 485.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6538N, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Turion 64 ML-28 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6538N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-28 and Xeon Gold 6538N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-28
Turion 64 ML-28
Intel Xeon Gold 6538N
Xeon Gold 6538N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-28 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6538N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-28 or Xeon Gold 6538N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.