Ryzen 5 8640U vs Mobile Sempron SI-40
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 8640U outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-40 by a whopping 6500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 5 8640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3216 | 565 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.76 | 44.61 |
Architecture codename | Sable (2008−2009) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023) |
Release date | 4 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 6 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 5 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
Bus rate | 1800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 5 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | S1g2 | FP8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 5 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 5 8640U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 5 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 5 8640U.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.20 | 13.20 |
Recency | 4 July 2008 | 6 December 2023 |
Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
Threads | 1 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Mobile Sempron SI-40 has 12% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 8640U, on the other hand, has a 6500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 5 8640U is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-40 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Ryzen 5 8640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.