Opteron 6376 vs Steam Deck OLED APU
Aggregate performance score
Steam Deck OLED APU outperforms Opteron 6376 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Steam Deck OLED APU and Opteron 6376 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1288 | 1523 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.61 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | no data |
Power efficiency | 29.09 | 2.88 |
Architecture codename | Van Gogh (Custom) (2023) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
Release date | 9 November 2023 (1 year ago) | 5 November 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $750 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Steam Deck OLED APU and Opteron 6376 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 768 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB (per die) |
Chip lithography | 6 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
Number of transistors | no data | 2,400 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Steam Deck OLED APU and Opteron 6376 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 4 |
Socket | no data | G34 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Opteron 6376. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Opteron 6376 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Opteron 6376. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Opteron 6376.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 4.63 | 3.52 |
Recency | 9 November 2023 | 5 November 2012 |
Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
Threads | 8 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 6 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Steam Deck OLED APU has a 31.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.
Opteron 6376, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The Steam Deck OLED APU is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6376 in performance tests.
Be aware that Steam Deck OLED APU is a notebook processor while Opteron 6376 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Steam Deck OLED APU and Opteron 6376, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.