Atom E3805 vs Sempron LE-1200
Primary details
Comparing Sempron LE-1200 and Atom E3805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Atom |
| Architecture codename | Sparta (2007) | Bay Trail |
| Release date | August 2007 (17 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Sempron LE-1200 and Atom E3805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron LE-1200 and Atom E3805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 3 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 3 Watt |
Atom E3805 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Sempron LE-1200 and Atom E3805. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron LE-1200 is a desktop processor while Atom E3805 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron LE-1200 and Atom E3805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
