Ultra 7 258V vs Sempron 2650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Sempron 2650
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.35
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.55
+3486%

Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms Sempron 2650 by a whopping 3486% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3068619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.3269.86
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.45 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache128 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM1Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R3 GraphicsArc 140V
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Sempron 2650 0.35
Ultra 7 258V 12.55
+3486%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 2650 551
Ultra 7 258V 19937
+3518%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 12.55
Recency 9 April 2014 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 258V has a 3485.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 833.3% more advanced lithography process, and 47.1% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 2650 in performance tests.

Note that Sempron 2650 is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 258V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 2650 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 2650
Sempron 2650
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 19 votes

Rate Sempron 2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 14 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 2650 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.