Celeron G465 vs Sempron 2650

VS

Aggregate performance score

Sempron 2650
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.35
+2.9%
Celeron G465
2012
1 core / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.34

Sempron 2650 outperforms Celeron G465 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30673071
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.320.92
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Detailed specifications

Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.45 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache1024 KB256 KB
L3 cacheno data1.5 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C66 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM1FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Sempron 2650 0.35
+2.9%
Celeron G465 0.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 2650 551
+0.7%
Celeron G465 547

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Sempron 2650 145
Celeron G465 301
+108%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Sempron 2650 234
Celeron G465 410
+75.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.34
Recency 9 April 2014 1 September 2012
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Sempron 2650 has a 2.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 2650 and Celeron G465, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 2650
Sempron 2650
Intel Celeron G465
Celeron G465

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 19 votes

Rate Sempron 2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 6 votes

Rate Celeron G465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 2650 or Celeron G465, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.