Atom 330 vs Sempron 2650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Sempron 2650
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.35
+52.2%
Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23

Sempron 2650 outperforms Atom 330 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 2650 and Atom 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30683189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.322.72
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Diamondville (2008−2009)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$43

Detailed specifications

Sempron 2650 and Atom 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.45 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache128 KB112 KB
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm251.9276 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C85 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data94 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 2650 and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM1PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 2650 and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Sempron 2650 and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 2650 and Atom 330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 2650 and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R3 Graphics-
จำนวนพาธไลน์128-
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Sempron 2650 and Atom 330 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Sempron 2650 and Atom 330 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12-
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 2650 and Atom 330.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Sempron 2650 0.35
+52.2%
Atom 330 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 2650 551
+51.8%
Atom 330 363

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.23
Recency 9 April 2014 2 April 2008
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 8 Watt

Sempron 2650 has a 52.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom 330, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 212.5% lower power consumption.

The Sempron 2650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 330 in performance tests.

Note that Sempron 2650 is a desktop processor while Atom 330 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 2650 and Atom 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 2650
Sempron 2650
Intel Atom 330
Atom 330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 19 votes

Rate Sempron 2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 2650 or Atom 330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.