Ryzen 5 3500 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.63
+99.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 5 3500 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen 5 3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking410924
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.96no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency8.4211.71
Architecture codenameZEN+ (2018−2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date3 October 2018 (6 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen 5 3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads246
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache32 MB16 MB
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen 5 3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen 5 3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen 5 3500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen 5 3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth93.867 GB/s51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 16.63
+99.2%
Ryzen 5 3500 8.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 25444
+99%
Ryzen 5 3500 12785

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 1278
Ryzen 5 3500 1514
+18.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 7364
+37.1%
Ryzen 5 3500 5370

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.63 8.35
Physical cores 12 6
Threads 24 6
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has a 99.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3500, on the other hand, has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 176.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Ryzen 5 3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Ryzen 5 3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 71 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 753 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 2920X or Ryzen 5 3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.