Ryzen 5 3500 vs Ryzen 7 2700X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
11.02
+36.9%
Ryzen 5 3500
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
8.05

Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Ryzen 5 3500 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking709940
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.28no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency9.9311.72
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date19 April 2018 (6 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads166
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.35 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache96K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 3500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 3500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 2700X 11.02
+36.9%
Ryzen 5 3500 8.05

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 2700X 17509
+36.9%
Ryzen 5 3500 12788

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 2700X 1253
Ryzen 5 3500 1513
+20.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 2700X 6117
+13.6%
Ryzen 5 3500 5383

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.02 8.05
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 6
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 2700X has a 36.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3500, on the other hand, has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 61.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 2700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 5 3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Ryzen 5 3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2994 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 766 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 2700X or Ryzen 5 3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.