Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking534not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency7.27no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release date29 July 2017 (7 years ago)20 November 2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads324
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache32 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm16 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors9,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2017 20 November 2024
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is a desktop processor while Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G
Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 20 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950 or Zhaoxin KaiXian KX-6000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.