Celeron G6900E vs Ryzen Embedded V2516
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded V2516 outperforms Celeron G6900E by a whopping 204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 968 | 1769 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | no data |
| Power efficiency | 77.28 | 5.52 |
| Architecture codename | Renoir (2020−2023) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.95 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP6 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68.269 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.12 | 2.67 |
| Recency | 10 November 2020 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 46 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded V2516 has a 204.1% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 360% lower power consumption.
Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
The Ryzen Embedded V2516 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900E in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
