Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen Embedded V2516

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded V2516
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
8.35
+186%
Celeron G6900
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.92

Ryzen Embedded V2516 outperforms Celeron G6900 by a whopping 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9161662
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Embeddedno data
Power efficiency51.705.90
Architecture codenameRenoir (2020−2023)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache384 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.269 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SPIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded V2516 8.35
+186%
Celeron G6900 2.92

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded V2516 13016
+186%
Celeron G6900 4551

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.35 2.92
Recency 10 November 2020 4 January 2022
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 46 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V2516 has a 186% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and 206.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron G6900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The Ryzen Embedded V2516 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V2516 and Celeron G6900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516
Ryzen Embedded V2516
Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V2516 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 163 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded V2516 or Celeron G6900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.