Atom x5-E3930 vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.33
+622%

Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a whopping 622% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x5-E3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13502771
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen Embedded5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)26 October 2016 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.3 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache384 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Intel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x5-E3930.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 4.33
+622%
Atom x5-E3930 0.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B 6677
+620%
Atom x5-E3930 928

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.33 0.60
Integrated graphics card 4.50 0.78
Recency 21 February 2018 26 October 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a 621.7% higher aggregate performance score, 476.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Atom x5-E3930, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Atom x5-E3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 21 vote

Rate Ryzen Embedded V1605B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded V1605B or Atom x5-E3930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.