Ryzen 7 8700F vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.68
+0.7%
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.54

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Ryzen 7 8700F by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking291293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.81
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency34.4728.43
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8AM5
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.68
+0.7%
Ryzen 7 8700F 19.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 31255
+0.7%
Ryzen 7 8700F 31044

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.68 19.54
Recency 25 July 2024 1 April 2024
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 20.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Ryzen 7 8700F.

Be aware that Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 258 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.