Celeron 4305UE vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 54 Watt
19.44
+1717%
Celeron 4305UE
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.07

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 1717% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 4305UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2882411
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)no data
Power efficiency34.076.75
Architecture codenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)1 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP8Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4Ano data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 890MIntel UHD Graphics 610

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 4305UE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 19.44
+1717%
Celeron 4305UE 1.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 30886
+1718%
Celeron 4305UE 1699

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 1.07
Integrated graphics card 21.52 1.89
Recency 25 July 2024 1 October 2018
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 1716.8% higher aggregate performance score, 1038.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 4305UE, on the other hand, has 260% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron 4305UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 or Celeron 4305UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.