Celeron M P4600 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Place in the ranking	291	2834
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)	Intel Celeron M
Power efficiency	34.31	1.51
Architecture codename	Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date	25 July 2024 (less than a year ago)	1 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$86

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M P4600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	12 (Dodeca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	24	2
Base clock speed	2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	5.1 GHz	2 GHz
Bus rate	no data	2500 MHz
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	12 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	24 MB	2 MB
Chip lithography	4 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	81+114 mm²
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	no data	382+177 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M P4600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	FP8	PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M P4600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A	no data
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M P4600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M P4600 are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M P4600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR5

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)

no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.68	0.56
Recency	25 July 2024	1 October 2010
Physical cores	12	2
Threads	24	2
Chip lithography	4 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	54 Watt	35 Watt

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a 3414.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M P4600, on the other hand, has 54.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Celeron M P4600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.