Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Celeron M P4500
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Celeron M P4500 by a whopping 2171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2788 | 523 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 1.67 | 47.34 |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4500 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | 54 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4500 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA988 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4500 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 880M |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.62 | 14.08 |
| Recency | 1 April 2010 | 1 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron M P4500 has -87.5% more threads.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has a 2171% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
