Xeon Gold 5420+ vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
20.28
Xeon Gold 5420+
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
37.34
+84.1%

Xeon Gold 5420+ outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5420+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data59.11
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency28.9816.92
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,848

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5420+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads2456
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB52.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5420+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSocket AM44677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5420+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5420+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5420+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5420+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5420+.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 20.28
Xeon Gold 5420+ 37.34
+84.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 31616
Xeon Gold 5420+ 58209
+84.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.28 37.34
Recency 30 September 2019 10 January 2023
Physical cores 12 28
Threads 24 56
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 205 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5420+, on the other hand, has a 84.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5420+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 5420+ is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Gold 5420+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Intel Xeon Gold 5420+
Xeon Gold 5420+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 52 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 or Xeon Gold 5420+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.