Xeon Silver 4510 vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
20.66
Xeon Silver 4510
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
22.33
+8.1%

Xeon Silver 4510 outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking280245
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9no data
Power efficiency28.9813.57
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$563

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2424
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache768 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache64 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSocket AM4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 20.66
Xeon Silver 4510 22.33
+8.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 31616
Xeon Silver 4510 34170
+8.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.66 22.33
Recency 30 September 2019 14 December 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has 130.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4510, on the other hand, has a 8.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510.

Note that Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is a desktop processor while Xeon Silver 4510 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon Silver 4510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Intel Xeon Silver 4510
Xeon Silver 4510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 52 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 or Xeon Silver 4510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.