EPYC 7532 vs Ryzen 9 7940HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 7940HX
2024
16 cores / 3216 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4 threads, 55 Watt
34.72
+1.2%

Ryzen 9 7940HX outperforms EPYC 7532 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7532 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9498
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.44
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameDragon Range-HX (Zen 4)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Current priceno data$800

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3216 x 5.2  GHz AMD Zen 464
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache1 MB2 MB
L2 cache16 MB16 MB
L3 cache64 MB256 MB
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors9900 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFL1Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 610Mno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 7940HX 34.72
+1.2%
EPYC 7532 34.30

Ryzen 9 7940HX outperforms EPYC 7532 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 9 7940HX 53704
+1.2%
EPYC 7532 53051

Ryzen 9 7940HX outperforms EPYC 7532 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.72 34.30
Recency 17 January 2024 19 February 2020
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 3216 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4 64
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 200 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7532.

Be aware that Ryzen 9 7940HX is a notebook processor while EPYC 7532 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 7940HX and EPYC 7532, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
Ryzen 9 7940HX
AMD EPYC 7532
EPYC 7532

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 18 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 7940HX or EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.