Xeon Platinum 8173M vs Ryzen 9 3900X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 9 3900X
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
20.54
+16.4%
Xeon Platinum 8173M
28 cores / 56 threads
17.64

Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon Platinum 8173M by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8173M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking269347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.46no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 9Intel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency18.51no data
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8173M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads2456
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache768 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache6 MB28 MB
L3 cache64 MB38.5 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8173M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4Socket P
Power consumption (TDP)105 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8173M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8173M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8173M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8173M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size128 GB1,536 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8173M.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 3900X 20.54
+16.4%
Xeon Platinum 8173M 17.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 9 3900X 32619
+16.4%
Xeon Platinum 8173M 28025

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.54 17.64
Physical cores 12 28
Threads 24 56
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm

Ryzen 9 3900X has a 16.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Platinum 8173M, on the other hand, has 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.

The Ryzen 9 3900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8173M in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 9 3900X is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8173M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 9 3900X and Xeon Platinum 8173M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Xeon Platinum 8173M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5136 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8173M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 9 3900X or Xeon Platinum 8173M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.