Xeon Phi 7230F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Phi 7230F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 381 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 45.53 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| Release date | 13 June 2023 (1 year ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Phi 7230F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 256 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Phi 7230F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP7/FP8 | 3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 230 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Phi 7230F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Phi 7230F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Phi 7230F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Phi 7230F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 June 2023 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 64 |
| Threads | 16 | 256 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 230 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 557.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7230F, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Phi 7230F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook processor while Xeon Phi 7230F is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Xeon Phi 7230F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
