Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.40
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.39
+5.7%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking386344
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency45.3347.91
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache8 MB8 MB
L3 cache16 MB16 MB
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size178 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP8FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon 780M

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 17.40
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 18.39
+5.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26626
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28137
+5.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2236
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2298
+2.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10743
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 10848
+1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+3.4%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2360

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 275
+2.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037
+10.8%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 9959

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 203
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 214
+5.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 1956
+3.6%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 6496
+4.5%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 6215

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 66442
+8.4%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 61303

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 363
+22.6%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 296

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.40 18.39

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has a 5.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 57 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 45 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.