Ryzen 5 4600H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.83
+85.4%
Ryzen 5 4600H
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
9.08

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Ryzen 5 4600H by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 4600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking393849
Place by popularitynot in top-10064
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency45.4819.08
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 4600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm7 nm
Die size178 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 4600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP8FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 4600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 4600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 4600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 4600H.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.83
+85.4%
Ryzen 5 4600H 9.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26730
+85.4%
Ryzen 5 4600H 14417

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2228
+62.4%
Ryzen 5 4600H 1372

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10627
+108%
Ryzen 5 4600H 5107

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+71.2%
Ryzen 5 4600H 1425

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+52.8%
Ryzen 5 4600H 176

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037
+81.5%
Ryzen 5 4600H 6080

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 203
Ryzen 5 4600H 352
+73.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888
+69%
Ryzen 5 4600H 1117

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 6496
+47.7%
Ryzen 5 4600H 4397

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 66442
+76.5%
Ryzen 5 4600H 37643

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 363
+75.4%
Ryzen 5 4600H 207

CrossMark Overall

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1620
+52.7%
Ryzen 5 4600H 1061

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 327
Ryzen 5 4600H 631
+93%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 12457
+87.9%
Ryzen 5 4600H 6631

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2581
+69.2%
Ryzen 5 4600H 1525

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.83 9.08
Integrated graphics card 18.32 6.04
Recency 13 June 2023 6 January 2020
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 85.4% higher aggregate performance score, 203.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 4600H in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and Ryzen 5 4600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 285212 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or Ryzen 5 4600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.