A6-3650 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.83
+1185%
A6-3650
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.31

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms A6-3650 by a whopping 1185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A6-3650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3922276
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)no data
Power efficiency45.511.24
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)30 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A6-3650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache512 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB0 KB
Chip lithography4 nm32 nm
Die size178 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A6-3650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP7/FP8FM1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A6-3650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A6-3650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Radeon HD 6530D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.83
+1185%
A6-3650 1.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26730
+1186%
A6-3650 2079

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2228
+655%
A6-3650 295

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10627
+1065%
A6-3650 912

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.83 1.31
Recency 13 June 2023 30 June 2011
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 1184.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 185.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook processor while A6-3650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A6-3650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
AMD A6-3650
A6-3650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 75 votes

Rate A6-3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or A6-3650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.