A10 Pro-7350B vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.40
+1292%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms A10 Pro-7350B by a whopping 1292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3822323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)AMD Kaveri
Power efficiency45.336.00
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date13 June 2023 (1 year ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB4096 KB
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography4 nm28 nm
Die size178 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP7/FP8FP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 17.40
+1292%
A10 Pro-7350B 1.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26630
+1291%
A10 Pro-7350B 1915

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2237
+699%
A10 Pro-7350B 280

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10752
+1532%
A10 Pro-7350B 659

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+485%
A10 Pro-7350B 2525

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+1406%
A10 Pro-7350B 162

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+389%
A10 Pro-7350B 55

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.40 1.25
Recency 13 June 2023 4 June 2014
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 19 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has a 1292% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

A10 Pro-7350B, on the other hand, has 84.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the A10 Pro-7350B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS and A10 Pro-7350B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
AMD A10 Pro-7350B
A10 Pro-7350B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 57 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 35 votes

Rate A10 Pro-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS or A10 Pro-7350B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.