Ryzen 3 7320U vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
10.31
+81.5%
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.68

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U outperforms Ryzen 3 7320U by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7621144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency63.8435.17
Architecture codenameCezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date19 April 2022 (2 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm6 nm
Die size180 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)AMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 3 7320U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes84

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 10.31
+81.5%
Ryzen 3 7320U 5.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 16078
+81.7%
Ryzen 3 7320U 8847

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 1530
+32.1%
Ryzen 3 7320U 1158

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U 5269
+45.8%
Ryzen 3 7320U 3615

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.31 5.68
Integrated graphics card 9.03 2.85
Recency 19 April 2022 20 September 2022
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm

Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U has a 81.5% higher aggregate performance score, 216.8% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 7320U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 7320U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 665 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7320U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U or Ryzen 3 7320U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.