Phenom II X4 955 (95W) vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Phenom II X4 955 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 737 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 66.25 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+) (2022) | Deneb (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 19 April 2022 (2 years ago) | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Phenom II X4 955 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 208 mm2 | 258 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Phenom II X4 955 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP7 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Phenom II X4 955 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Phenom II X4 955 (95W) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Phenom II X4 955 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Phenom II X4 955 (95W).
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 April 2022 | 1 April 2009 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 95 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U has an age advantage of 13 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 650% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Phenom II X4 955 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 955 (95W) is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U and Phenom II X4 955 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
