Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.38
+17.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
13.07

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking450572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency22.3919.03
Architecture codenameCezanne PRO (Zen 3) (2021)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date1 June 2021 (3 years ago)1 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplier3839
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size180 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C95 °C
Number of transistors10,700 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)AMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G.

PCIe version3.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 15.38
+17.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G 13.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 24426
+17.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G 20760

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 1984
+3.1%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G 1924

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G 8288
+15.2%
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G 7195

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.38 13.07
Integrated graphics card 9.04 7.46
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G has a 17.7% higher aggregate performance score, 21.2% faster integrated GPU, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G and Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 145 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 132 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G or Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.