Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
13.06
+35.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.64

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking583798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency19.0114.04
Architecture codenameCezanne (2021−2024)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 June 2021 (3 years ago)6 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3932
L1 cache384 KB768 KB
L2 cache3 MB4 MB
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm12 nm
Die size180 mm2213 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors10,700 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 7-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G 13.06
+35.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 9.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G 20739
+35.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 15309

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G 1920
+72.7%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 1112

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G 7161
+34%
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 5344

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.06 9.64
Recency 1 June 2021 6 September 2018
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm

Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G has a 35.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 133 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 223 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G or Ryzen 7 PRO 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.