Ryzen 5 5600H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 15 Watt
9.53
Ryzen 5 5600H
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
10.66
+11.9%

Ryzen 5 5600H outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking801739
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency60.1322.42
Architecture codenameRenoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020)Cezanne-H (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date7 May 2020 (4 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed1.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier1733
L1 cache512 KB384 KB
L2 cache4 MB3 MB
L3 cache8 MB16 MB
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors9800 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP6FP6
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsPRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5600H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1800 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 9.53
Ryzen 5 5600H 10.66
+11.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 15136
Ryzen 5 5600H 16927
+11.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1335
Ryzen 5 5600H 1604
+20.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 5073
Ryzen 5 5600H 5788
+14.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 8379
+44%
Ryzen 5 5600H 5817

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 29574
Ryzen 5 5600H 34229
+15.7%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 11008
Ryzen 5 5600H 11952
+8.6%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 3.95
+66.6%
Ryzen 5 5600H 6.58

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 16
Ryzen 5 5600H 19
+18.4%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1410
Ryzen 5 5600H 1563
+10.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 181
Ryzen 5 5600H 223
+23.2%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 2.12
Ryzen 5 5600H 2.62
+23.6%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 7.1
Ryzen 5 5600H 7.4
+4.3%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 4227
Ryzen 5 5600H 7497
+77.4%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 80
Ryzen 5 5600H 95
+19.1%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 202
Ryzen 5 5600H 251
+24.4%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 6153
Ryzen 5 5600H 6536
+6.2%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 352
+8.6%
Ryzen 5 5600H 324

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 1149
Ryzen 5 5600H 1423
+23.8%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 4438
Ryzen 5 5600H 5359
+20.7%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 39649
Ryzen 5 5600H 44558
+12.4%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U 205
Ryzen 5 5600H 267
+30.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.53 10.66
Recency 7 May 2020 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 5600H, on the other hand, has a 11.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 months.

The Ryzen 5 5600H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 5 5600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
Ryzen 5 5600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 193 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4670 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U or Ryzen 5 5600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.