Celeron 6205 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 792 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Power efficiency | 60.25 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
| Release date | 7 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 17 | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9800 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FP6 | BGA1499 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68.27 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 7.46 | 4.55 |
| Recency | 7 May 2020 | 1 September 2020 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U has 64% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
