Ryzen 7 5800G vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 5800G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 792 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 60.25 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) | Cezanne (2021−2024) |
| Release date | 7 May 2020 (4 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 5800G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 17 | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9800 Million | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 5800G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP6 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 5800G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 5800G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 5800G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68.27 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 5800G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 7.46 | 4.50 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U has 65.8% faster integrated GPU, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 5800G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 5800G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Ryzen 7 5800G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
