Ryzen 5 9600X vs Ryzen 7 7840HS

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.89
Ryzen 5 9600X
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
19.72
+4.4%

Ryzen 5 9600X outperforms Ryzen 7 7840HS by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 9600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking328303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency49.2127.66
Architecture codenamePhoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release dateJanuary 2023 (1 year ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 9600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm4 nm
Die size178 mm270.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors25,000 million8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 9600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP8AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 9600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMESMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 9600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 9600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon 780MAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 9600X.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.89
Ryzen 5 9600X 19.72
+4.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 28905
Ryzen 5 9600X 30176
+4.4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 7642
Ryzen 5 9600X 9324
+22%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 47933
Ryzen 5 9600X 54599
+13.9%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 15663
Ryzen 5 9600X 17706
+13%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 2.64
Ryzen 5 9600X 2.62
+0.8%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 30
Ryzen 5 9600X 31
+2.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 2573
Ryzen 5 9600X 2630
+2.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 279
Ryzen 5 9600X 341
+22.4%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 3.31
Ryzen 5 9600X 4
+20.8%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 14.8
+10.4%
Ryzen 5 9600X 13.4

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 7 7840HS 147
Ryzen 5 9600X 154
+5%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 7 7840HS 290
Ryzen 5 9600X 364
+25.6%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 7 7840HS 7064
Ryzen 5 9600X 14819
+110%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ryzen 7 7840HS 11874
Ryzen 5 9600X 12840
+8.1%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 7 7840HS 196
+6.2%
Ryzen 5 9600X 185

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ryzen 7 7840HS 1964
Ryzen 5 9600X 2507
+27.7%

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 7 7840HS 6618
Ryzen 5 9600X 7760
+17.3%

7-Zip

Ryzen 7 7840HS 70330
+3%
Ryzen 5 9600X 68266

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 7 7840HS 321
Ryzen 5 9600X 380
+18.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.89 19.72
Integrated graphics card 18.29 1.98
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840HS has 823.7% faster integrated GPU, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 9600X, on the other hand, has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 9600X.

Be aware that Ryzen 7 7840HS is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 9600X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840HS and Ryzen 5 9600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
Ryzen 5 9600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1607 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 104 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 9600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 7840HS or Ryzen 5 9600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.